In 2020 we saw some huge financial penalties for bribery and corruption. But one, in particular, ran into billions of dollars. Find out how to avoid hefty fines.
You may wonder why we describe bribery settlements here rather than simply fines. Because of the nature of the financial gains from bribery, often disgorgement is the most significant penalty. Dwarfing the actual fines by an enormous amount.
We track these settlements on an ongoing basis, find out more in our post about the biggest bribery fines of 2021.
In February 2020, Airbus confirmed it would pay €3.6bn to settle a long-running investigation by French, UK and US authorities into bribery and corruption. This case was unprecedented in its scale and chutzpah. It is also controversial that Airbus was let off with a DPA.
In 2012, a whistleblower alleged that Airbus's GPT subsidiary used gifts and bribes of over £14m to secure a contract to upgrade military communications in Saudi Arabia. In 2017, the French-based planemaker was also investigated over its use of intermediaries and third-party consultants to secure airline sales. The subsidiary at the centre of the allegations has ceased trading.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals has agreed to pay $678 million to close a case against them in which they were accused of bribing and paying kickbacks to thousands of doctors between 2002 and 2011.
As part of the deal, Novartis said that it "agreed to new corporate integrity obligations with the Office of Inspector General of the US Department of Health & Human Services that will change how the company delivers peer-to-peer programs in the U.S."
Novartis was accused of hosting tens of thousands of speaker programs and similar events "under the guise of providing educational content, when in fact the events served as nothing more than a means to provide bribes to doctors," the Department of Justice claimed.
Novartis paid doctors purportedly as compensation for delivering lectures regarding a Novartis drug. However, prosecutors claim that many such programs were little more than social events held at pricey restaurants, with little or no talk about healthcare or medicine. Prosecutors also revealed that some of the events had never even taken place.
"Giving these cash payments and other lavish goodies interferes with the duty of doctors to choose the best treatment for their patients and increase drug costs for everyone," stated Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss for the Southern District of New York. "This office will continue to be vigilant in cracking down on kickbacks; however they may be dressed up, throughout the pharmaceutical industry."
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd has agreed to pay $123.1 million to settle civil and criminal charges relating to the bribery of Chinese officials in media outlets and government agencies to boost its business in China. The multi-level marketing firm, most famous for its range of dietary supplements, entered a three-year deferred prosecution agreement after admitting to conspiring to violate the books and records provision of the FCPA.
US Authorities found that Herbalife schemed from 2007 to 2016 to bribe Chinese officials with entertainment, cash, holidays and dinners to reduce government scrutiny, gain direct selling licenses and suppress negative coverage by state-controlled media.
Apart from a $55.74 million criminal fine, Herbalife will also need to pay $67.31 million in disgorgement and interest to settle a related SEC case. The firm will also be required to upgrade its compliance procedures to ensure this case does not repeat itself.
The World Acceptance Corporation (WAC) has agreed to pay the SEC $21.7 million in penalties and disgorgement to resolve FCPA offences in Mexico. What happened is that one of WAC's Mexican subsidiaries was found to have paid $4.1 million in bribes to Mexican government officials and union workers to obtain or keep business.
Of the $4.1 million in bribes, no less than $1.5 million was handed to government officials, $580,000 to union officials, and $480,000 to third-party intermediaries who used parts of it to bribe government and union officials. Due to insufficient record keeping, it is "unclear how the remaining $1.5 million in payments were split," the SEC said.
What is particularly noteworthy is how WAC attempted to disguise these bribes. WAC Mexico transferred money into accounts connected to officials and used an intermediary to "distribute large bags of cash" among the officials. According to the SEC, the payments were referred to as "scholarships", "royalty payments", or "support".
We have created a comprehensive bribery & corruption roadmap to help you navigate the compliance landscape, supported by several financial crime prevention courses in our Compliance Essentials Library.
We also have 100+ free compliance training aids, including assessments, best practice guides, checklists, desk aids, eBooks, games, posters, training presentations and even e-learning modules!
Finally, the SkillcastConnect community provides a unique opportunity to network with other compliance professionals in a vendor-free environment, priority access to our free online learning portal and other exclusive benefits.